Commentary for Bava Kamma 155:7
אלא כי איתמר דרבא לענין פטר חמור כדתנן אין פודין לא בעגל ולא בחיה ולא בשחוטה ולא בטריפה ולא בכלאים ולא בכוי
[which implies that the rule holds good] only where the parents were of the species of <i>'ox'</i> and the firstling was of the species of <i>'ox'</i>, what question can there be regarding a hybrid itself? — The statement made by Raba must therefore have referred to the firstling of an ass,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which has to be redeemed by a sheep (Ex. XIII. 13). so that a hybrid would therefore not be eligible. ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 155:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.